By July 31, 2013 1 Comments Read More →

Kenyan Lawyer To Take Jews and Israel to Hague… OVER CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS

RNS-JESUS-TRIAL

 

By Micah Naziri and Lauren Izso

Dola Indidis, a Kenyan lawyer, wants to send the Jewish people to the Hague. Israel being the closest thing that Indidis can conceptualize as the official representative of Judaism and the Jewish people (however flawed such a perception may be), he wants to focus on the self-described Jewish State as the target of prosecution.

Is this a plea from the Geneva Convention, arguing for the Right of Palestinian return? Is Indidis concerned about claims of discriminatory treatment of Ethiopian Jews in Israel? Could it be about discrimination against various Mizrachi communities of a Sefardic minchag, perhaps in some Ashkenazi private schools? Maybe about the treatment of Sudanese refugees in some communities?

If you guessed any of these things, you would be wrong. Indidis wants the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague to consider a re-trial of Jesus, and convict those responsible for his unlawful crucifixion.

Indidis has filed a petition with the International Court of Justice, suggesting that the trial and crucifixion of Jesus was unlawful, and The State of Israel among other Jews should be held responsible, Kenyan news outlet the Nairobian reported on Friday.

Dola Indidis, a lawyer and former spokesman of the Kenyan Judiciary is reportedly attempting to sue Tiberius (Emperor of Rome 42 BC-37AD), Pontius Pilate, a selection of Jewish elders, King Herod, the Republic of Italy and the State of Israel.

“Evidence today is on record in the bible, and you cannot discredit the bible,” Indidis told Kenyan Citizen News.

Yes, those he suggests should have been convicted during the original trial have not been alive for more than 2000 years, however Indidis insists that the government for whom they acted can and should still be held responsible.

“I filed the case because it’s my duty to uphold the dignity of Jesus and I have gone to the ICJ to seek justice for the man from Nazareth,” Indidid told the Nairobian. “His selective and malicious prosecution violated his human rights through judicial misconduct, abuse of office bias and prejudice.”

Indidis apparently named the states of Italy and Israel in the lawsuit because upon the attainment of independence, the two states incorporated the laws of the Roman Empire, those in force at the time of the Crucifixion.

He is challenging the mode of questioning used during Jesus’ trial, prosecution, hearing and sentencing; the form of punishment meted out on him while undergoing judicial proceedings and the substance of the information used to convict him.

The case was first filed in the High Court in Nairobi, but was rejected. Indidis had then applied to have it heard at the ICJ, which, the Kenyan news website Standard Media (SDE) reported constituted a pre-trial panel that would consider his case.

Indidis says he wants to establish what crime Jesus was charged with and prays that the court decides “that the proceedings before the Roman courts were a nullity in law for they did not conform to the rule of law at the material time and any time thereafter.”

“Some of those present spat in his face, struck him with their fists, slapped him, taunted him, and pronounced him worthy of death,” Indidis also told SDE.

When Jesus died, Indidis insists he was not given an opportunity to be heard. “I am suing as a friend,” he said.

Indidis insisted on the validity of his case, saying “I know with a matter of fact and truth we have a good case with a high probability of success and I hope it is done in my lifetime.”

When asked about the case, a spokesperson from the IJC told legal news website Legal Cheek, “The ICJ has no jurisdiction for such a case. The ICJ settles disputes between states. It is not even theoretically possible for us to consider this case.”

 

1 Comment on "Kenyan Lawyer To Take Jews and Israel to Hague… OVER CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Mary Kaye says:

    The people responsible for the crucifixion of Jesus, if he actually existed (which hasn’t been proven) and if it actually happened (which also hasn’t been proven), are long dead. The people currently alive in Israel are not responsible for anything that happened (maybe) 2000 years ago.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.